Hey @dopamino, thanks for setting this up early, the clear timeline really helps everyone get ready.
I see the upside of keeping momentum strong, as you mentioned. The seasonal launches clearly boost engagement and claims, so I get why continuous rewards matter for growth.
At the same time, I agree with @graven and @Sov that the overlap makes it tough to fully analyze Season 2 while planning and voting for Season 3. Good governance takes real time too: reviewing data, writing rationales, coordinating quorum, all of that keeps the DAO resilient but adds invisible workload.
In my Season 2 rationale I highlighted “infrastructure and coordination layers” as key for protocol resilience. Maybe there’s room now to revisit what @seliqui raised, whether we could run a small pilot to test lightweight incentives or rewards for active governance contributors. Something simple, like a tiered structure or a leaderboard, similar to how dev contributor rewards were framed in Season 2.
Curious how others see it, could be worth trying in S3.