Introduction
We’re Curia Lab, a team of DAO governance analysts, researchers, and engineers focused on transparent, data-driven governance. We’ve contributed to major DAOs like Optimism, Safe, and Arbitrum through building tools, reporting, and being an active delegate, helping communities make better decisions through analytics and clear communication.
Vision and Focus
We believe Superfluid DAO can set the standard for real-time, community-led protocol growth. Our goal is to support high-quality governance, improve transparency, and help the DAO allocate resources effectively. Our primary focus will be governance processes and accountability.
Commitment and Engagement
We’ll dedicate 10+ hours per week (or as needed) to Superfluid governance. Expect regular updates from us on the forum and a consistent presence on community calls to stay aligned and responsive.
Why Delegate to Me?
We have a strong track record as active delegates across several DAOs. We don’t just vote — we explain our decisions, share useful data & insights, and suggest ways to improve governance. We’re fully focused on supporting transparent, informed, and accountable decision-making for Superfluid. If you’d like thoughtful and reliable representation, delegate to Curia!
Rationale: We’re voting for Sherlock because their recent audit provides deep insight into the protocol, their streamlined triage process eases the core team’s workload, and their targeted researcher outreach with a competitive fee model makes them the most practical choice for the DAO right now.
Vote: 25% for Growth Campaigns, 25% for Superfluid
Labs apps, 12.5% for Superfluid Labs new apps,
12.5% for Flow State, 12.5% for Nerite, 12.5% for
Dev Contributor Rewards.
Rationale: We have allocated our votes to these specific campaigns because we believe they offer the most strategic value and highest potential for driving significant, long-term growth for the ecosystem.
Rationale: We are voting against enabling SUP transferability at this time because the proposal fails to address critical questions of execution. Key details regarding liquidity management, mitigation of price volatility, and the technical implementation are absent, introducing unacceptable risks to the token ecosystem. We would support a future proposal that includes a comprehensive and well-defined plan for a stable market launch as well as more token utility is being planed.
Vote:
14.29% for Superfluid Growth Campaigns, 14.29% for Superfluid Labs, 14.29% for Flow State - Streaming Funding, 14.29% for Streme, 14.29% for Giveth, 14.29% for Nerite, 14.29% for beamZ - Farcaster Streaming Tips
Rationale: We voted for an equal allocation across these seven initiatives because they represent a diverse set of projects for driving the Superfluid ecosystem growth. This selection supports everything from core development, adoption, and expansion to other vital use cases in public goods.
Rationale: We are voting in favor of this proposal as we believe enabling SUP transferability is a vital and logical step in the progressive decentralization of the Superfluid protocol. This move will not only attract new stakeholders and diversify our governance but also align Superfluid with the standards of other mature DAOs. What makes this proposal particularly strong is its prudent, milestone-driven framework, which ensures transferability is activated responsibly only after critical benchmarks in security, liquidity, and overall protocol readiness have been achieved. This thoughtful approach effectively balances the need for growth with the imperative of stability, making it a well-structured plan that I am confident will support the long-term health and success of the ecosystem.
