The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We’re voting FOR SIP-7.
This fixes the gaps from the earlier attempt. It sets a clear window and makes the unlock conditional on real work being finished first. We support this structure because it moves the DAO forward without rushing execution.
We agree. Making SUP transferable is the right long-term move. It will open the door to broader participation and real market integrations, which is important for Superfluid’s growth.
Ordering the milestones this way is sensible. Staking and initial liquidity before the switch should reduce early sell pressure and help price discovery. We support this. A simple public tracker of milestone status until the unlock would help the community follow progress.
Clear roles and process are important. We are in favor, and we ask for a short readiness note before execution (what’s done, what’s pending, and the go-live plan). That will keep expectations aligned across the DAO.
It is good to watch external signals. We also suggest publishing a few internal indicators before the final switch, such as a basic holder distribution view and recent governance participation. This will help the DAO judge readiness beyond market mood.
We are voting FOR SIP-7. It advances decentralization with guardrails, puts real utility and liquidity in place before the unlock, and gives a firm window for execution. We believe this is in the best interest of Superfluid and its users.