Proxy Delegate Thread

Delegate Platform
1

Delegation Pitch: Proxy

1. Introduction
Delegation Address: 0x6De8448e7d5f58af394CC9540ABe703d0c955dFd
Name/Handle: @Proxy

Background: Proxy (formerly Boardroom Consulting) is a team of DAO governance professionals with expertise in creating tools, data solutions, and analysis for decentralized organizations. With experience in supporting the governance of over 350 DAOs and protocols, our focus is on fostering governance structures that are efficient, transparent, and inclusive. Our team brings a comprehensive understanding of governance needs across diverse sectors, including DeFi, staking, L2 scaling, and decentralized applications. By leveraging our deep familiarity with governance dynamics, we aim to provide Morpho with strategic guidance and data-driven insights that enable sound decision-making.

Contributions: Our team has been in the space since its early days, and we’ve worked with DAOs to build their governance systems (documentation, stakeholder management processes, etc.) before launch, we’ve acted as an ongoing service provider for DAOs to facilitate their governance operations, and we’ve served as an active delegate for multiple protocols.

2. Vision and Focus
Vision for the Superfluid DAO: Governance decisions should not be made blindly. Here at Proxy, we highly value data-driven insights, and we aim to provide Superfluid DAO with strategic guidance based on quantitative metrics. We draw upon our experience building a governance data platform to inform our evaluation of proposals.

Focus Areas:

  • Commitment to Transparency: We emphasize open communication and will provide the community with clear updates on our rationale for each governance action.
  • Fostering Sustainable Growth: We aim to support Superfluid’s evolution by focusing on sustainable practices that prioritize the ecosystem’s resilience and adaptability over short-term gains.
  • Experimentation: We shouldn’t be afraid of trying new things in governance. Sticking to the same old processes because “that’s how it’s always been” can hold a project back. We value approaching governance decisions with a fresh perspective and offering new ideas when we can.

3. Commitment and Engagement
Time Commitment: As much time is required (10+ hours/week)

Community Interaction: We will provide the community with comments that convey our voting rationale in this Delegate Pitch post. If you have any questions, send us a message!

4. Why Delegate to Me?
Proxy offers a unique blend of strategic insight and practical experience. We’ve built and operated governance infrastructure, engaged with diverse stakeholders, and acted as both advisors and active delegates. This broad exposure allows us to approach governance with neutrality, understanding the trade-offs and perspectives across the ecosystem without being tied to any single agenda. Our focus is on strengthening Superfluid’s governance through clear communication, data-backed decision-making, and a commitment to long-term protocol resilience.

4 Likes
2

Proposal: SIP #3 - Community Bounty Pool

Vote: Sherlock

Rationale: We are voting for Sherlock as the provider for Superfluid’s community bounty program. We evaluated both proposals based on visibility, protocol familiarity, and operational efficiency. Sherlock has direct experience auditing the protocol and offers a low-maintenance triage workflow that fits Superfluid’s current resourcing. While Immunefi brings significant industry reach, we believe Sherlock’s tailored approach, targeted researcher base, and ease of management make it the best fit here.

2 Likes
3

Proposal: SIP #4: Ecosystem Campaigns - Season 2

Vote & Rationale: We decided to allocate the largest VP (15% each) to GoodDollar (for its user base and proven role as an on-ramp into Superfluid); to the Growth Campaigns category (for broad community activations, referral programs, and a community security bounty pool); to Flow State (for expanding streaming-based grants and decentralized funding initiatives); and to Superfluid Labs’ flagship apps like SuperBoring (given its strong DeFi usage and volume traction). Mid-sized allocations (10% each) for the Superfluid Labs new apps (especially Incentivizor to attract liquidity providers), to Nerite (the native streamable stablecoin has great potential for adoption), and to Giveth (which saw recurring donation volume jump nearly 400% thanks to Season 1 rewards). Smaller allocations (5% each) to Streme.fun (an innovative community token launcher) and to Dev Contributor Rewards, ensuring we still encourage creative new streaming experiments and reward open-source developers contributing to Superfluid.

3 Likes
4

Proposal: [SIP #5] Enable Transferability of the SUP Token

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: We voted to abstain on this specific version of the proposal. Enabling transferability makes sense, but we think that the SafeDAO example provided in the forum discussion provided a better structured set of milestones for implementing it. On the point of liquidity planning, we disagree a bit on the idea that the DAO should approve transferability prior to the Foundation communicating what to expect post-transferability/making sure there’s market depth. This vote is largely a symbolic “go-ahead,” but we’d still rather see a more robust roadmap in place before voting in favor of the proposal.

1 Like
5

Proposal: SIP #6: Ecosystem Campaigns - Season 3

Vote: For

Rationale: We decided to allocate the largest VP (15% each) to GoodDollar (continuing its Season 1–2 UBI on-ramp success and now adding SUP incentives for GoodDollar’s builder program), to Flow State (for spearheading streaming grants with ecosystem partners; its tooling has streamed ~$140k to builders so far and it’s expanding to strategic rounds like Gitcoin), and to Superfluid Labs (given the strong DeFi traction of its apps e.g. AlfaFrens has the most DAUs and SuperBoring handles ~$2 million in monthly DCA streaming volume). Mid-sized allocations (10% each) for the Superfluid Foundation Growth campaigns (continuing broad community activations and dev mini-app rewards that attracted the highest unique participants in Season 2), to Streme (the Super Token launcher whose streaming-stake model drove ~$3 million in token swap volume with 2,500+ weekly users, making it the largest third-party distribution partner), to Giveth (SUP rewards in Season 2 spurred a >200% jump in recurring donation volume), and to Flows.wtf (a continuous funding app already streaming ~$143k total to 370 users, accelerating web3 community grants and accelerator programs). Smaller allocations (5% each) to beamZ (an innovative Farcaster mini-app bringing continuous streaming tips to creators, lowering the friction of onchain tipping), to Nerite (the first natively-streamable stablecoin USND on Arbitrum, which we support to encourage its adoption), and to Gardens (a community governance platform about to launch streaming into its ~$100k of pooled funds).

1 Like
6

Proposal: SIP #7: SUP Transferability

Vote: For

Rationale: We voted in favor of the proposed SUP transferability plan. We appreciate the extended thought that went into the proposal and the formation of the TPWG after the previous vote was rejected. Timing and liquidity were some of our primary concerns previously, and enabling staking / bootstrapping initial liquidity are part of the key milestones that must be met before transferability is enabled in this proposal.

1 Like
7

Proposal: SIP #8: SUP Reserve Staking and Liquidity Provision

Vote: For

Rationale: We voted in favor of enabling SUP staking/liquidity provision & approving a DAO contribution. Adding rewards functionality to SUP supports price stability generally and minimum staking periods reduce sell pressure, all things we’d like to support. This is a sensible next step following the SUP transferability proposal.

1 Like
8

Proposal: SIP #9: Turn ETHx and USDCx into yield for the DAO

Vote: For

Rationale: We’re in favor of upgrading the contracts for ETHx, USDCx, etc to help the DAO accrue yield income to its treasury. Productive DAO funds are always better than idle DAO funds and it should drive up more deposits.

1 Like
9

Proposal: SIP #10: Ecosystem Campaigns - Season 4

Vote & Rationale: Largely in line with our S2 and S3 rationales. We decided to allocate the largest VP (15% each) to Superfluid Foundation Growth Campaigns, SuperBoring, Streme, and GoodDollar. For the first, it keeps the funnel wide (social + referral + mini-app activations), adds liquidity-side incentives for pure SuperTokens, and ships a useful ENS locker UX. The second is a high-traction DCA app now committing up to 20% of fees to SUP buybacks post-TTE: a direct, app-driven SUP flywheel atop meaningful usage (10k+ users; ~$8M+ total, ~1k DAU). For Streme, v2 adds custom vaults/vesting/staking safety valve; ~2,500 weekly active users and growing. We view Streme as composability infra that multiplies SUP-aligned tokens. GoodDollar has impressive reach (1M+ users; ~40k DAU; ~223k/day streams on Celo) and a clear builder track via FlowState and Gardens; still a top on-ramp to streaming behavior. 10% VP each to Banger and Giveth. Banger is a new Labs consumer surface on Farcaster (social betting on virality) built on Streme v2/Base, has strong potential to pull culture into streaming UX and reward SUP stakers. For Giveth, recurring donations via streams grew from ~$407 (Jan) to >$10k (Sep); for S4 we prefer the Foundation-curated list direction discussed in the thread. 4% each among the rest: Gardens, Nerite, Degen Dogs, Suno, Dankland.

1 Like