The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR SIP #6 and participating in the weighted vote across the listed eligible campaigns.
This proposal continues an important mechanism for distributing SUP through ecosystem campaigns. We believe the seasonal approach has brought strong experimentation to the Superfluid ecosystem and aligned incentives for builders, users, and DAO participants. The voting structure, budget sizing, and 5% cutoff are all well-designed and in line with the protocol’s long-term token distribution strategy.
We support SIP #6 because:
- It keeps the DAO directly involved in SUP distribution, helping align grants with the ecosystem’s priorities
- It sets clear expectations on timing, eligibility, and campaign execution
- It balances flexibility (sub-campaigns, dynamic adjustments) with accountability (cut-off rule, campaign reporting)
However, going forward, we believe it would be helpful to introduce standardized post-season reporting for each funded campaign. Even basic KPIs such as total users onboarded, Superfluid volume generated, or retention metrics would allow more informed decisions in Season 4 and beyond.
Here are our Votes (Weighted Across the Following Campaigns)
1. Superfluid Foundation Growth Campaigns - (20%)
We are allocating a vote share here because the Foundation has proven its ability to drive top-of-funnel engagement and attract first-time users through Community Activations and Mini Apps. These are low-friction entry points and useful for onboarding new wallets into streaming primitives.
2. Superfluid Labs - (20%)
We are supporting Superfluid Labs due to its track record in building DeFi and SocialFi applications with measurable streaming volume. Projects like SuperBoring and AlfaFrens not only experiment with novel use cases, but also bring continuous flows to the protocol in real volume terms.
3. Flow State – Streaming Funding - (20%)
We are voting for Flow State because their work is tightly aligned with Superfluid’s core strengths: streaming-based funding mechanisms. Their partnerships with Octant, Gitcoin, and GoodDollar are strategically important, and their tooling has helped shift the framing of grants from lump sums to continuous flows.
4. Streme - (20%)
Streme is helping introduce streaming-native token launches to the Farcaster and Base community. Their work supports token design, staking mechanics, and new product thinking directly rooted in Superfluid. Given the traction they’ve seen with minimal marketing, we see strong upside in supporting their next phase.
5. Giveth - (20%)
We are allocating support to Giveth because their integration with recurring donation streams is helping Superfluid gain presence in the public goods and impact space. Their growth in recurring donation value from $400 to over $6,000+ in just a few months shows traction. Further alignment via SUP could deepen this adoption.
We appreciate the thoughtfulness and clarity of the SIP. Season 3 brings a strong set of campaign options across early-stage experiments and proven drivers of usage. We look forward to seeing the impact of these activations and suggest that the DAO explore shared KPI reporting formats across campaigns to make the impact easier to evaluate in future seasons.