[SIP #6] Ecosystem Campaigns - Season 3

[dopamino]

Abstract

SPR Season 3 is scheduled to go live following Season 2.
This proposal invites the DAO to vote on which eligible ecosystem campaigns will be included in Season 3 and what SUP allocation they will receive.

SIP Type

Non Constitutional

Motivation

Season 3 continues distribution of SUP tokens to those most interested in the future of the protocol and progresses the DAOs decentralisation journey.

Rationale

DAO voting to choose which eligible ecosystem campaigns will be included in Season 3 and what SUP allocation they will receive is consistent with the protocol’s vision to create a future where everyone earns, every second.

Specifications

• SPR Season 3 budget of 25,000,000 SUP - The proposal allocates 25,000,000 (Twenty Five Million) SUP to Season 3, corresponding to 2.5% of the total supply, to the Eligible Season 3 Campaigns, subject to the votes they receive by the DAO. Superfluid Tokenomics specified the DAO will receive it’s SUP allocation over 10 quarters and that 300,000,000 SUP (=30% of SUP supply) will be distributed to users of ecosystem applications. So far, Seasons 1 & 2 each had budgets of 50,000,000 SUP. So a budget of 200,000,000 SUP remains for Ecosystem Campaigns over the next 8 quarters. 25,000,000 SUP = 1/8 of that 200,000,000.

• Eligible Campaigns - Eligible Campaigns are those Season 3 - Ideas which have been deemed to have provided sufficient information to indicate the project/app/team is ready to integrate with the SPR system and manage a successful campaign. Eligible Campaigns for Season 3 are listed below under Voting Options. Submissions not deemed eligible in this round are welcome to be resubmitted in future rounds when they have developed further.

• Weighted Voting Strategy - DAO members (and Delegates) can spread their voting power across the Eligible Campaigns. % share of vote would then be applied to the Season 3 SUP budget to determine each campaign’s SUP allocation for Season 3.

• 5% cut-off - Eligible Campaigns with less than 5% of the vote will not be included in Season 3 and SUP votes for them will be redistributed to the successful campaigns on a pro-rata basis.

• Sub-campaigns - Campaigns which are granted SUP Allocations for Season 3 can then determine distribution of their SUP allocation to their sub-campaigns where applicable.

• Campaign Start and End dates - Campaigns which are granted SUP Allocations for Season 3 must begin during Season 3, otherwise they will forfeit their allocation and the DAO will retain the allocation. Campaigns should last no longer than 6 months.

Voting Options

DAO members (and Delegates) can spread their voting power across the numbered choices below.

1. Superfluid Foundation Growth Campaigns

• Community Activations
• Mini Apps Dev Rewards

2. Superfluid Labs

• AlfaFrens
• SuperBoring
• Liquidity
• Labs Forge
• SuperRoulette
• Banger

3. Flow State - Streaming Funding

• Strategic Streaming Funding Campaigns
• Funding Cracked Devs on Farcaster

4. Streme

5. GoodDollar

6. Giveth

7. Nerite

8. beamZ - Farcaster Streaming Tips

9. Flows.wtf

10. Gardens

Timeline of next steps

Voting will be open from 30 July - 12 August - LINK TO SNAPSHOT VOTE
Season 3 Start & End Date: expected to launch 21 August and last for 3 months

Overall Cost

No significant incremental costs are expected to be incurred by the Foundation from the implementation of this proposal.

[0x10BF54fDdb83F1e8bF]

I welcome the application for SIP #6. The participatory approach that encourages DAOs to select viable ecosystems in Season 3 is a strategic step in distributing SUP fairly and on target.

Distribution of tokens to parties who truly contribute and care about the future of the protocol will strengthen community engagement and support sustainable decentralization.

I fully support this proposal and am ready to follow further developments for the progress of Superfluid and its ecosystem.

[dopamino]

Voting for this proposal is now live: LINK TO SNAPSHOT VOTE

[Euphoria]

The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR SIP #6 and participating in the weighted vote across the listed eligible campaigns.

This proposal continues an important mechanism for distributing SUP through ecosystem campaigns. We believe the seasonal approach has brought strong experimentation to the Superfluid ecosystem and aligned incentives for builders, users, and DAO participants. The voting structure, budget sizing, and 5% cutoff are all well-designed and in line with the protocol’s long-term token distribution strategy.

We support SIP #6 because:

• It keeps the DAO directly involved in SUP distribution, helping align grants with the ecosystem’s priorities
• It sets clear expectations on timing, eligibility, and campaign execution
• It balances flexibility (sub-campaigns, dynamic adjustments) with accountability (cut-off rule, campaign reporting)

However, going forward, we believe it would be helpful to introduce standardized post-season reporting for each funded campaign. Even basic KPIs such as total users onboarded, Superfluid volume generated, or retention metrics would allow more informed decisions in Season 4 and beyond.

Here are our Votes (Weighted Across the Following Campaigns)

1. Superfluid Foundation Growth Campaigns - (20%)
We are allocating a vote share here because the Foundation has proven its ability to drive top-of-funnel engagement and attract first-time users through Community Activations and Mini Apps. These are low-friction entry points and useful for onboarding new wallets into streaming primitives.

2. Superfluid Labs - (20%)
We are supporting Superfluid Labs due to its track record in building DeFi and SocialFi applications with measurable streaming volume. Projects like SuperBoring and AlfaFrens not only experiment with novel use cases, but also bring continuous flows to the protocol in real volume terms.

3. Flow State – Streaming Funding - (20%)
We are voting for Flow State because their work is tightly aligned with Superfluid’s core strengths: streaming-based funding mechanisms. Their partnerships with Octant, Gitcoin, and GoodDollar are strategically important, and their tooling has helped shift the framing of grants from lump sums to continuous flows.

4. Streme - (20%)
Streme is helping introduce streaming-native token launches to the Farcaster and Base community. Their work supports token design, staking mechanics, and new product thinking directly rooted in Superfluid. Given the traction they’ve seen with minimal marketing, we see strong upside in supporting their next phase.

5. Giveth - (20%)
We are allocating support to Giveth because their integration with recurring donation streams is helping Superfluid gain presence in the public goods and impact space. Their growth in recurring donation value from $400 to over $6,000+ in just a few months shows traction. Further alignment via SUP could deepen this adoption.

We appreciate the thoughtfulness and clarity of the SIP. Season 3 brings a strong set of campaign options across early-stage experiments and proven drivers of usage. We look forward to seeing the impact of these activations and suggest that the DAO explore shared KPI reporting formats across campaigns to make the impact easier to evaluate in future seasons.

[apebiznek.eth]

YES vote YES YES YES

[markcarey]

Voting Power question:

I have noticed that for many voters – but not all – the “voting power” displayed on their Snapshot profile (and shown to the voter before voting) does not match the the voting power attributed to their actual votes.

Examples from the the top of the list votes:

zeni.eth – Voting power on profile: 6.4M SUP (https://snapshot.box/#/s:superfluid.eth/profile/0x764E427020Ad72624075c61260192C6E486D15a5 note you need to wait several seconds for this to appear on the profile). Voting power attributed to the votes cast: 4.1M SUP

Jesus Crypto Plaza - voting power on profile: 5.6M, voting power on vote cast: 3.2M SUP

graven.eth - voting power on profile: 3.9M, voting power on votes cast: 2.9M

Then there are some notable exceptions, where the numbers match (there may be others):

superfluid.vijay.eth - voting power on profile: 10.5M, voting power on votes cast: 10.1M (this is not quite exact, but very close compared to the examples above)

0x31f1…A5Cb - voting power on profile: 4.7M, voting power on votes cast: 4.7M

Thoughts on these discrepancies? Confused…

[dopamino]

@markcarey good question.

Delegated voting power is based on what others had initially delegated.

But if during the voting period they decide to cast their own vote (even if they had previously delegated), then can do so and the voting power shown in the Delegate’s vote is reduced accordingly. The Delegate’s vote figure also includes the Delegate’s personal voting power. You can see the latest of those here under tokens although the actual personal voting power counted in the vote is based on the table as it was when voting began.

[dopamino]

Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for [SIP #6] Ecosystem Campaigns - Season 3, to choose which campaigns will be included and what SUP allocation they will receive.

Voting period has ended.
Results available here on Snapshot.

• 8 campaigns each received over 5% of the vote and will be included in Season 3
• SUP allocation for these campaigns listed below
• Season 3 is scheduled to launch 21 August